most of the wrecked GT's that i have read about are modified with more power and not enough tire and are wrecked on the street, particularly in cold weather....
personally i feel the safest place i can drive my GT is on a runway despite the speed attained....
granted i am utilizing alot of safety gear when i am racing but still a runway has alot of room for error and is a controlled environment unlike a freeway in socal, etc....
P.S. - driving fast cars at night is very dangerous imo as the cars can absolutely outrun their headlights....
+1 This.Mid Engine Cars and Physics have much to do with vehicle dynamics.
+1 This.
I believe that the physics of a mid engine car play a huge roll in the reason you see so many drivers loss-it going straight in a Ford GT. At the risk of sounding like a know-it-all... which I don't by any means but here it goes: The GT has a 43/57% weight distribution favoring the rear of the car. For some reason this exact percentage distribution that can be found on many other very expensive performance cars(Lamborghini Murci, Ferrari 430), it is said to be "perfect" by some... I have no idea why. But when considered in the context of physics, I like to think of a throwing dart illustration. The heavy end will always try to move to forward position of travel. While this characteristic may enhance the cars agility in the turns, it exaggerates it's tendency to push the rear of the car into the direction of travel... and consequently makes the 'point of no return' much easier to reach. Whereas a front engine car has (usually) more weight on the front axle, therfor the front for the car wants to stay in the front (where we like it).
If you couple this with a driver who is not expecting problems and a complete lack of stability control hardware and traction control logic, reactions times will be much more delayed than they might otherwise be at the track or in another car with the aforementioned nannies.
....
P.S. - driving fast cars at night is very dangerous imo as the cars can absolutely outrun their headlights....
...not to mention the inability of one's PERIPHERAL vision to pick up something that may be on a collision course with one's car until it's faaaaar too late.
+1 This.
I believe that the physics of a mid engine car play a huge roll in the reason you see so many drivers loss-it going straight in a Ford GT. At the risk of sounding like a know-it-all... which I don't by any means but here it goes: The GT has a 43/57% weight distribution favoring the rear of the car. For some reason this exact percentage distribution that can be found on many other very expensive performance cars(Lamborghini Murci, Ferrari 430), it is said to be "perfect" by some... I have no idea why. But when considered in the context of physics, I like to think of a throwing dart illustration. The heavy end will always try to move to forward position of travel. While this characteristic may enhance the cars agility in the turns, it exaggerates it's tendency to push the rear of the car into the direction of travel... and consequently makes the 'point of no return' much easier to reach. Whereas a front engine car has (usually) more weight on the front axle, therfor the front for the car wants to stay in the front (where we like it).
If you couple this with a driver who is not expecting problems and a complete lack of stability control hardware and traction control logic, reactions times will be much more delayed than they might otherwise be at the track or in another car with the aforementioned nannies.
+1 This.
I believe that the physics of a mid engine car play a huge roll in the reason you see so many drivers loss-it going straight in a Ford GT. At the risk of sounding like a know-it-all... which I don't by any means but here it goes: The GT has a 43/57% weight distribution favoring the rear of the car. For some reason this exact percentage distribution that can be found on many other very expensive performance cars(Lamborghini Murci, Ferrari 430), it is said to be "perfect" by some... I have no idea why. But when considered in the context of physics, I like to think of a throwing dart illustration. The heavy end will always try to move to forward position of travel. While this characteristic may enhance the cars agility in the turns, it exaggerates it's tendency to push the rear of the car into the direction of travel... and consequently makes the 'point of no return' much easier to reach. Whereas a front engine car has (usually) more weight on the front axle, therfor the front for the car wants to stay in the front (where we like it).
If you couple this with a driver who is not expecting problems and a complete lack of stability control hardware and traction control logic, reactions times will be much more delayed than they might otherwise be at the track or in another car with the aforementioned nannies.
...You have to develop those reflexes at a very young age so that the muscle memory is there when you need it, learning to control a high performance car after you are over 30 can be really tough...
As twobjshelbys said of the short wheelbased Cobra, it will snap into a spin in a heart beat, but under the exact same conditions, the FGT will not spin due to the FGT's wider stance, lower center of gravity, suspension improvements, wider tires, etc. If you want to hammer the gas pedal on a Cobra, you had better be pointing it in a straight line or you will be swapping ends in a fraction of a second.