I am not liking the Lambo - design is way too fussy
It's not the overall cabin height. It's the relationship between an unbelted occupant of a certain height and where, when and with what force they would theoretically impact their head inside the cabin. See the round greenhouse on LaFerrari, and the extremely round greenhouse on the P1.
I will ask what the specific rule was but it's probably something in FMVSS 208 where the rules changed for cars built after September 1, 2006, which is why Ford finished production of the car by exclusively building cars for the Canadian market for the last month of production until they stopped on October 1.
Look up FMVSS 208 S5.1.2. My guess is that's it, but I have to see Camilo this afternoon and will ask him. Not that he'll remember the rule number, but he'll remember the test, as he has bitched about it before.
Reading FMVSS 208 S5.1.2 made my head hurt
BlackICE;331761Ford must have more than 50 to 100+ people dedicated to regulation compliance.[/QUOTE said:Add a couple of zeros...... :frown
Well.........................I guess Pockets is the proverbial pair of brown shoes in a tuxedo world...again. :facepalm:
The car does nothing for me. It's okay, I guess, but I much prefer the looks of the 458. :shrug
Reading FMVSS 208 S5.1.2 made my head hurt
Anybody care to make a wager as to the percentage of these cars that will sustain damage to the door mirrors within a 3 year period?
They stick out so far, with so little support, I think an attorney wouldn't have too much of a problem arguing 'Attractive Nuisance'. They have, 'Come Break Me Off' written all over them.
T Can't wait to see what an oil change costs though.
The answer is "if you have to ask. ... "
Ford must have more than 50 to 100+ people dedicated to regulation compliance.