whipple 4.0


kumar

GT Owner
Jan 31, 2007
1,011
Dallas
Did I miss something?

I know a bunch of people were interested in the new Whipple but I don't see anyone asking about Fubar's results.

I believe he made 765rwhp with the 19psi pulley on pump gas in 100+ degree Texas heat. I think he should be real close to 790ish rwhp on a 65 degree day. Seems to me to be a good 50hp gain. Also, from what I remember, the IATs Fubar reported were a lot lower than previous Whipple figures I have heard. That has got to be a big deal in the real world.

Just figured there would be more talk about it. :banana
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
We don't know if those were corrected or uncorrected numbers. Also, as we all should know, hard to compare dyno numbers. The IAT2 were a little high for my comfort zone, but in the summer heat in TX, maybe not out of the norm.
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
I will try to get the dyno charts posted up here. I thought I would have them by now, but you know how that goes.
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
This is the graph with 0 smoothing.... with smoothing set on 5 the result was 765hp.

whipple40.jpg
 

RALPHIE

GT Owner
Mar 1, 2007
7,278
That's a beautiful torque curve!! :thumbsup :thumbsup

:cheers
 

Black GT

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 2, 2006
771
I wonder why the torque doesnt match the HP? Probably just tuning. Mine made 743hp 743rwt with a Gen 2 19psi. Great numbers with the 4L
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
I wonder why the torque doesnt match the HP? Probably just tuning. Mine made 743hp 743rwt with a Gen 2 19psi. Great numbers with the 4L

Wow, that is strange. I wouldn't think you could tune out 100ft/lbs of torque.
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
Here is all the Dyno runs. We never saw anything close to 760rwt

All_whipple_4L_pulls.jpg


sorry for the big pictures
 

lthlvpr

GT Owner
Mar 8, 2006
299
Did you do a BEFORE dyno so you can compare? Otherwise, it's tough to really make sense of the true increase of the Whipple 4.0....
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
Yes, but I have not gone back to that dyno to compare. I feel that you really need to run it again on the same machine (hopefully with similar ambient conditions) to compare changes like that.

These dyno runs were strictly for tuning.


Here is the prior dyno chart but it is on a different machine dynojet machine.

STD_correction_best_pull_after_Shorty_Header_w_airfuel_and_torque_speed.jpg
 

kumar

GT Owner
Jan 31, 2007
1,011
Dallas
best way to compare is to find a closed private road in Mexico and run a car with a gen 1 or 2 Whipple.
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
best way to compare is to find a closed private road in Mexico and run a car with a gen 1 or 2 Whipple.

+1, or in Russia!
 

kumar

GT Owner
Jan 31, 2007
1,011
Dallas
where is 427 aggie? we need him for this test
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
Well I'e got the billet a-arms, so my car is much lighter than his. It probably wouldn't be a fair run.
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
New info:

The fuel pumps are probably working as intended. They are supposed to be good to 1200hp. Here is the math:

770 rwhp
130 lost in the transmission (conservatively)
300 lost in the whipple
------
1200 crank hp
 

Mullet

FORD GT OWNER
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Oct 21, 2008
2,468
Houston Texas
New info:

The fuel pumps are probably working as intended. They are supposed to be good to 1200hp. Here is the math:

770 rwhp
130 lost in the transmission (conservatively)
300 lost in the whipple
------
1200 crank hp



300 lost to the whipple????
 

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
Ya but I was told that is reasonable on a big blower. The 3.4L whipple would call a 90% duty cycle on fuel pumps. So I figure that 100% on the 4L is normal. My next step is a set of bosch 0-44s fuel injectors. Hopefully the Ford ems can deal with more psi. I'd like to run 75-100psi in the lines.

I'll keep you guys in the loop.
 

B.M.F.

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 29, 2009
1,785
Minnesota
Ya but I was told that is reasonable on a big blower. The 3.4L whipple would call a 90% duty cycle on fuel pumps. So I figure that 100% on the 4L is normal. My next step is a set of bosch 0-44s fuel injectors. Hopefully the Ford ems can deal with more psi. I'd like to run 75-100psi in the lines.

I'll keep you guys in the loop.

Mark
Put the 52lbers out of the Gt500's in your car. They are easy and cheap to get. Or you can have your 39's converted to 50lbs injectors for about 30-45$ apiece.
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
Ya but I was told that is reasonable on a big blower. The 3.4L whipple would call a 90% duty cycle on fuel pumps. So I figure that 100% on the 4L is normal. My next step is a set of bosch 0-44s fuel injectors. Hopefully the Ford ems can deal with more psi. I'd like to run 75-100psi in the lines.

I'll keep you guys in the loop.

I are running out of fuel pressure/flow, or injector pulse width, or both?
 

ItsOnlyMoney

Heritage GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Aug 18, 2006
89
Celina, Tx
Well I'e got the billet a-arms, so my car is much lighter than his. It probably wouldn't be a fair run.

This bigger issue is the GVW difference :willy :rofl