One of the benefits of having a DynoJet is being able to test at will. Since I am new to this supercharging thing I am still learning. The best way I know to learn is by making more runs and trying different things.
As I stated in my last thread, I have had a few conversations with Tony at HP Performance and he has been excellent to deal with. He never makes a guy feel like a dummy and is very willing to share information. And although I have only talked to him on the phone, it sounds like he has a smile on his face at all times. I don't know about the rest of you, but he is the kind of guy I like to deal with.
I got his latest tune for the GT and after a few tweaks this is the difference between my runs with the old tune and his tune:
I made two runs with the old tune. RUNFIL~1.DRF represents the first one. I made a total of 4 runs with HP Performance tunes. The first started out at 564 rwhp followed by 569, 569, and 572. RUNFIL~6.DRF represents the sixth one. I am using the datalog feature of the SCT tuner and recording every run. I was in communication with Tony (on a weekend no less!) and he aided me with the adjustments to the tune.
Tony's tune is also a safe one. As you can see, the A/F curve is right in the 12.0:1 range. I am from the old school and read plugs after every run. With Tony's tune, the blueing line is right on the 90* bend of the ground strap - just where it should be.
When I was all through I also performed a compression test and found great results. This motor truly impresses me.
Since I was admonished in my last thread for not using a dyno graph smoothing value of 5, I am basing all the following on that value. As always, these numbers are SAE corrected.
Here is a summary:
_______________rwhp__rwtq
Stock___________511__474
Accufab 'X' pipe__519___483
'X' pipe & tune____534__511
Re-gap plugs_____540__514
HP Perf. Tune_____572__521
Pretty amazing! (As an interesting point, with smoothing set to zero the uncorrected values were 589.43 rwhp and 530.76 rwtq.)
Steve
As I stated in my last thread, I have had a few conversations with Tony at HP Performance and he has been excellent to deal with. He never makes a guy feel like a dummy and is very willing to share information. And although I have only talked to him on the phone, it sounds like he has a smile on his face at all times. I don't know about the rest of you, but he is the kind of guy I like to deal with.
I got his latest tune for the GT and after a few tweaks this is the difference between my runs with the old tune and his tune:

I made two runs with the old tune. RUNFIL~1.DRF represents the first one. I made a total of 4 runs with HP Performance tunes. The first started out at 564 rwhp followed by 569, 569, and 572. RUNFIL~6.DRF represents the sixth one. I am using the datalog feature of the SCT tuner and recording every run. I was in communication with Tony (on a weekend no less!) and he aided me with the adjustments to the tune.
Tony's tune is also a safe one. As you can see, the A/F curve is right in the 12.0:1 range. I am from the old school and read plugs after every run. With Tony's tune, the blueing line is right on the 90* bend of the ground strap - just where it should be.
When I was all through I also performed a compression test and found great results. This motor truly impresses me.
Since I was admonished in my last thread for not using a dyno graph smoothing value of 5, I am basing all the following on that value. As always, these numbers are SAE corrected.
Here is a summary:
_______________rwhp__rwtq
Stock___________511__474
Accufab 'X' pipe__519___483
'X' pipe & tune____534__511
Re-gap plugs_____540__514
HP Perf. Tune_____572__521
Pretty amazing! (As an interesting point, with smoothing set to zero the uncorrected values were 589.43 rwhp and 530.76 rwtq.)
Steve