Probably not mid engine - nothing on which to base it unless they're going to do another ultra expensive one off based on the NFGT technology in which case its a couple of years away and has a price tag that puts it out of the Mustang crowd's pocketbook.
An 800HP Mustang sounds like what Ford would have done for the Shelby GT500. Is the Ford/Shelby "partnership" over?
True ... Bizzarrini ...Mid engine doesn't necessarily mean behind the cockpit. Wasn't the C7 also mid engine?
mid (adj) mediocre, so so, mehBy what definition is the c7 mid engine?
OK. I think the classic definitions are:Back when I bought an RX-7 in 1981, Mazda advertised it as a "Mid-front engine car" which meant that the engine was completely behind the line of the front axle. Since the Rotary engine was very short, this was a reasonably accurate description. Even though it had a solid (multilink) rear axle, it was very nimble with low polar moment of inertia.