GM puts ZR1 on hold until further notice.


AlohaGT

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Jul 13, 2007
1,596
Honolulu, HI
'Said B4, and 'will say again...if a guy's 'gunna' pay over 6 figures for any car - it better LOOK LIKE it cost over 6 figures. The ZR1 'duzzunt'. It just looks like a std C6 with a few add ons - if one knows where to look (as has been mentioned before).

'NICE CAR and all that. 'GREAT car in fact. 'Pbly every bit the equal of a stock FGT in almost all measureable areas. But, it doesn't LOOK the part. It just doesn't grab ya on a visceral level like, for example, the FGT does. And when one is plunking down supercar 'munny' - THAT factor definately has to be there in large chunks. The ZR1 doesn't have it IMO.

Honestly, how many cars grab ya like the FGT does at under $200K?
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
Honestly, how many cars grab ya like the FGT does at under $200K?

None, but I am a bias member of this forum, so what do I know.:biggrin
 

Joehand1

Tungsten GT Owner
Sep 20, 2007
599
Hattiesburg, MS, USA
I've got a buddy who placed a supercharger on his Z06, now 720 hp.

Cheap way to get the ZR1 performance.
 

richardhead

GT Owner
Sep 19, 2006
169
Not Good If You Take Delivery In Minnesota

All ZR1 deliveries are on hold until further notice. This was disclosed by the BG Museum in Kentucky to folks planning on picking up their ZR1s next week. No reason cited by GM. What is odd is that they cleared the invoices to the dealers, which tells me that it may not be a big deal. If you are anticipating a delivery, call in and verify.

In Minnesota, with passage of new law, that means an increase in registration/plate fees from $99.00 if registered before Sept 1, to around $1,000.00 if registered on or after Sept 1. A few folks will be angry here.

Not me, however, I've had mine for a while....
 

Attachments

  • 100_1957small.JPG
    100_1957small.JPG
    159.5 KB · Views: 101

djs

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Jun 7, 2007
2,082
Thinking about the ZR1 setback has made me consider some things.
1. I hope GM actually makes a few bucks by making and selling a Corvette that has an MSRP north of $100G's.
2. Given the present environment for GM as a whole, I doubt they will.
3. I imagine there are rooms full of bean counters at GM that wish the car had never been concieved or at least stillborn.
4. I thank God that the guys at GM who gave the go ahead on the car had the stones to do so.

Now, saying all that, I probably wouldn't buy a ZR1 even if I could get one at MSRP (unless I could flip it easily-heh heh heh) and the reason for that remains that it still looks too much like most other Vettes (a topic that's been thorougly covered elsewhere on this forum). However, there is an ongoing automotive double standard towards the Corvette about the car's reputation versus many of the more elite cars in the market place. Some of this is self induced because GM might not have the $$ to address some of the Corvettes (repeated) shortcomings; lower grade interior, perceived poor paint quality, etc., but the fact remains that the most recent Corvette in all iterations, and the previous Z06 as well, are terrific cars for the dough. Furthermore, the knock against the Vette is always that it is just that; a Corvette. It's been around forever now, and it's still plastic, and it ain't a Porsche. But that last point is really an apple/oranges argument. The Vette has never been near a 911 (or subsequent versions) price range, and still every new bow tie model is reviewed by the auto press as if it is a direct competitor to the Porsche. Look, I've never owned a Porsche, haven't really wanted one, with the possible exception of the more recent Turbo (O.K., the 928 argument went this far with my other half; "honey, it has 4 real seats and the kids can sit in back" {that's when we only had 2 kids, but we bot the E500 Benz instead}), but I don't understand how the auto press gives a pass to Porsche when the car has been essentially the same IN LAYOUT for the last 40 years. The 911 iterations are all superb cars, but like the Vette, they have grown in weight/mass since the early cars, and the price still maintians a huge spread over the domestic plastic one. I guess what this all comes down to more than anything else is the stigma of the Vette being perceived as an overly large domestic (read American) car, and I think that's an unfair characterization. All one has to do is watch a Top Gear review of the car and you can see the snear on Clarkson's face the minute he approaches the car. Much of that blame goes to the car's reputation as being cartoonish, or bloated, and not European, and sophisticated. But like it or not, the crude Z06 can put nearly any other performance car (and many supercars) back on the trailer, with the ZR1 doing more so. The problem still comes back to the issue that even for the higher performance versions of the Vette (which schoolboys and gearheads can identify, but no one else cares about) they all look the SAME! Maybe if the ZR1 looked remotely like the mid engine "dream Vettes" on various Motor Trend covers 30 years ago, testers like Clarkson wouldn't have their minds made up about the car while they were walking towards it.
Don't think for a minute that when Ford started working on the GT that every cynic in the car biz said to himself "it's the wrong F car," just as they did with the Pantera umpteen years ago. They were ready to say the same thing the whole way along with the GT as well, until they realized that Ford not only got it right, but that the car was so much better than they could have imagined it left the speechless. Again, remember Clarkson's GT review? He was apoplectic at first. He couldn't believe he was driving a car that had the engine from the truck he considered to be the worst Ford made, the Lightning.

I hope the ZR1 delay is nothing more than a problem solving issue, and not that GM is bleeding so much red ink that the bean counters are forcing the #s to be cut back. The irony of all this is at a time when so many of us car afficianados have the disposable income to buy these unique models, the manufacturers can barely bring them to market. The GT is gone (who wouldn't have wanted a chance at a factory "lightweight GT" in the mode of a 430 Scuderia), the Viper has one foot in the grave, and the ZR1s may just languish on dealers lots. It's too bad. They all deserve better.
 
H

HHGT

Guest
They released them this morning. Shipments taking place now. Latest source cites the reason as a software programming issue. Who knows.

So here is the question. Never mind I'll start a new thread...
 
Last edited:

Kingman

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Aug 11, 2006
4,072
Surf City, USA
If all else fails..blame a computer???

The 21rst Century equivalet of 'the dog ate my homework'.

I guess GM has let everyone go in their PR department.
 

Doc

Huge ****ing Crybaby
May 15, 2006
113
Now, saying all that, I probably wouldn't buy a ZR1 even if I could get one at MSRP.
I would not buy any U.S. made vehicle at MSRP. :biggrin

Furthermore, the knock against the Vette is always that it is just that; a Corvette. It's been around forever now, and it's still plastic, and it ain't a Porsche.
It is just a Corvette. But you can install a set of road racing 305/35/18 tires to a used Z06 and pass just about everyone that takes their car to a road race event. As someone else mentioned, a used C5Z06 can be bought for $20K. Just add $2500 in race tires and wheels. The brake cooling ducts (all four calipers) are stock as is the oil temperature gauge.

Look, I've never owned a Porsche, haven't really wanted one...
You should try one. I always owned a number of Fords (and still do beyond my sig). I've owned a few Porsche 911's (and Carrera's). Porsche has not won 28,000 professional race victories but for no other reason than they build a good performance car.

The 911 iterations are all superb cars, but like the Vette, they have grown in weight/mass since the early cars, and the price still maintians a huge spread over the domestic plastic one.
The C5Z06 and the C6Z06 weigh ~3135 lbs. That is the reason that you can bolt on a 305 race tire and go very fast. A new Porsche 911 TT weighs in at 3547 lbs. The 911 TT has 480hp and costs $135,000.

And don't ignore the 3886 lb. GT500KR as one car that needs to go on a diet.

I guess what this all comes down to more than anything else is the stigma of the Vette being perceived as an overly large domestic (read American) car, and I think that's an unfair characterization.
I always tell people that the gold chain was included (in the dash) with the Z06 that I bought (used; half of retail). :wink I really don't care (at my age) what people may perceive; I just enjoy the speed on the track.

Don't think for a minute that when Ford started working on the GT that every cynic in the car biz said to himself "it's the wrong F car," just as they did with the Pantera umpteen years ago. They were ready to say the same thing the whole way along with the GT as well, until they realized that Ford not only got it right, but that the car was so much better than they could have imagined it left the speechless. Again, remember Clarkson's GT review? He was apoplectic at first. He couldn't believe he was driving a car that had the engine from the truck he considered to be the worst Ford made, the Lightning.
What a minute. :lol You can't compare a FGT with a Porsche or a Corvette. :wink

...and not that GM is bleeding so much red ink that the bean counters are forcing the #s to be cut back.
I'd suggest that Ceberus/Chrysler, Ford, and GM are bankrupt. Their balance sheets are beyond repair. The only way that they can survive is with government guarantees. Like Fan and Fred, they will probably receive taxpayer help.
 

Empty Pockets

ex-GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Oct 18, 2006
1,361
Washington State
I've got a buddy who placed a supercharger on his Z06, now 720 hp.

Cheap way to get the ZR1 performance.


He'd better "cool it" in the 'lead foot dept' then. My understanding is that the reason GM didn't go with a supercharged 427 is because it's cyl walls are just too thin to stand up to any kind of decent boost. :ack
 

skyrex

FORD GT OWNER
Mark II Lifetime
Apr 11, 2008
2,115
Lake Las Vegas, Henderson, NV
He'd better "cool it" in the 'lead foot dept' then. My understanding is that the reason GM didn't go with a supercharged 427 is because it's cyl walls are just too thin to stand up to any kind of decent boost. :ack

Too true EP. One of the things I found so impressive about the GT was how you could add power without having to rebuild the engine with better internals. I bought two cars that had applications (procharger on a C5 convertible, twin turbo's to an NSX-T) that were "supposed" to be made for the stock engines and not cause damage and I ended up having to do expensive engine rebuilds to both cars.

Seeing that billow of white smoke :eek pouring out of the exhaust is always a good feeling :thumbsdow. I learned my lesson that you can't expect to add power without internal problems....the exception being our GT's. That is just another in a long line of feathers in the GT's cap in my opinion. :thumbsup
 

skyrex

FORD GT OWNER
Mark II Lifetime
Apr 11, 2008
2,115
Lake Las Vegas, Henderson, NV
Also did they put out recalls on the ZR1's that were already delivered? :confused Just curious....