MoTec for those that are interested


Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
My tuner 'Fish" does a lot of MoTec work and he was ask to expound on the whys and hows of the after market ECU. I thought you guys might be interested in the information. It was very educational for me. I hope theres not a test later tho.

http://www.dallasracing.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7208
 
So you have to be a member to view?

John
 
My bad, I just post the stuff in here. I just thought you guys would find the responses and commentary interesting. This will generally be the "meat" of a thread started by my tuner on a different forum regarding a number of questions he was being asked about the ECUs and their ability. He is an authorized reseller/installer... I guess that's a big deal. This is a long read but if you like the technical goodies, then it's not bad.

MoTeC:

I’m a MoTeC dealer, have installed, tuned, and used them for over 10years in tons of professional applications. Most of my business is composed of supporting pro teams utilizing MoTec. I sell it and sell it exclusively because it works, it has the best technical support, I believe it has the best software, I believe they have the best data interpreting software, and its price point for a pro system is better than any other “Pro” system. I used to sell other lower brand systems to give a customer a lower priced option rather than losing the business. Those systems ended up costing the customer less up front but ended up costing them more in the long run due to issues with hardware not working or failing hardware or causing a lost motor because the hardware failed. What’s saving 5 grand if you lose a 20k or more motor because the system fails? I now no longer utilize anything but MoTeC by choice.

Fubar is a friend so I pull my hair out every time on the dyno with the crippling stock computer. I’m done with that… the stock computer in the GTs is impressive for a stock system but many performance enthusiasts are way past that with their build, Mark is one of them.

I’m pretty picky with what street builds I take on, but when I do they are pretty serious builds. Right now for example I have a turbo GT500 in the shop. It already has the MoTeC system wired, working, and controlling the motor. Below is an example of the options it entails… all is through the m800.

Antilag- to bring the big turbos up quickly, two stages… one for the highway and one for launching

Single Stage Dry Shot- for if the customer chooses to use the nitrous instead of the antilag to bring the turbos up. I program the computer to squirt it and shut it off once the boost is where I want it. It is also there as a bargaining chip for something to concede in a street race negotiation that won’t affect performance (he has anitlag ;)

Launch control- put your foot on the floor and dump the clutch… the computer will control the power level to control the allowed wheel slip. It does this every time to control the launch making it dead consistent. Also saves wear on the clutch.

Traction control- race grade… I’ve had years perfecting my setup for traction control on pro road race Vehicles… I put this in my street projects. The Shelby has a switch for turning it off for burnouts.

Boost by Gear- Big power takes good control to make it usable on the street and safe…. Usable applied power is dictated by the tire contact patch. The engine torque it takes to overcome the tire’s adhesion is dictated by the torque multiplication through the transmission… this is why we do boost by gear and engine rpm. This is how all my pro drag applications are controlled. Give me a 3,000hp turbo drag motor on the street and I’ll make it drivable and control when it can put down what.

Drive by Wire- This is very important on a high boost/horsepower application. The wastegate spring dictates how much boost you can make on the low and high side. It is recommended that whatever max boost you want to run, you should have a spring in the gate that is at least half that. The Shelby is set to make 36psi boost on race gas… so it requires an 18psi spring. The car on the street can only put down (hook up without spin) about 8psi of boost. I use the throttle to limit the allowable boost in 1st gear. The driver’s foot is on the floor but the throttle will only open enough to allow the power level in first gear that I setup. This is how you make very powerful street cars fast and manageable on the street. I hear people say “too much power to use on the street” or “you can’t use all that power”… bull s*&%! It may not be till 3rd or 4th gear but I’ll use it on you 

Some people argue to just use the 18psi spring and let the traction control catch what it can’t use. The problem is that TC is a safety net, not a crutch. If you have TC busy dumping the excessive power your allowing the motor to have, then if you drive over something slick, how much headroom does the TC have to do its job to save your butt or anyone else around you while you’re playing. Saftey is very important to me and this is why I prefer to use DBW.

Others will argue to richen up the system… this is a long shot on a high horsepower application and it contaminates the combustion chamber, fouls plugs, etc…. Others will argue to use ignition retard… this puts excessive heat in the exhaust valves leading to Detonation, especially on pump gas… it also pumps excessive heat into the exhaust. Granted it’s for a short period of time but I think it’s the wrong approach. The Shelby comes DBW from ford but I can retrofit DBW to any vehicle, its pretty straigt forward.

Knock Module- Detonation is very complex, the frequencies that the metal components in your motor ring at from knock is like a fingerprint. Every motor is different. It takes a very sophisticated control strategy to accurately and consistently detect it and then address it to stop the detonation. The MoTeC knock sensor module allows me to log the characteristics of a motor and then properly set up a knock control strategy. It will sense which cylinder is knocking and then address only that cylinder with ignition retard… leaving the ones that are behaving alone.

Multiple ECU configurations- The M800 has 4 programming slots…. It can store 4 separate ecu configurations. On the Shelby we are only using 2 of them… one for pump gas and one for race gas. The config also changes the allowable boost (higher for race gas) with the filp of the switch. I can also have 4 different cars with different engines and unplug the ecu from one, plug it into the other car, the MoTeC will sense which car it’s plugged into and swap the config to that car’s programming, start the car, and drive off. This is for customers that want MoTeC on all their cars but don’t want to buy and ECU for each of them. Buy one ecu and 4 harnesses… just saves some money and prevents having to get the laptop out each time you want to do something.

No Lift Shift Ignition Cut- strain gauge imbedded on the shift lever allows the computer to sense the gear force and apply an ignition cut… the cut is different depending on which gear the car is when the shift is initiated. This is harder on synchronized transmissions but not having to close the throttle on a shift is huge for big turbo cars.

All other basic control of the fuel system is in control by the MoTeC… fans, intercooler pumps, warning lights, etc….

Mark had listed the M880… the M800 is the one I prefer and suggest. The M880 is a higher device with a little more capability but the minimal advantages it has is given up by the fact that it utilizes 22awg wire. From experience I believe the wire gauge is too thin and prone to failure. I recommend everything to be 18awg or larger for longevity and reliability unless you’re a pro team looking to save weight by using thinner wire and have the budget to carry spare harnesses with you to the track. I still drive pro teams toward the M800 and tell them that 22awg wire is a DNF waiting to happen.

BIG WORD OF ADVICE…. MoTeC is the most flexible system in the world… with increased flexibility, comes increased complexity. The computer is only as competent as the person on the keyboard. In other words, the computer is dumb, if a monkey on the keyboard tells it to do something stupid it will do it. These systems are also not for the average installer… the wiring is very sophisticated and should be performed by an authorized MoTeC installer. The more complex your MoTeC system is the better and more experienced installer I recommend you find. I do installs for other MoTeC dealers and 99% of the problems I see and clean up from other shops is wiring related. It’s not because they’re stupid, it’s because it is complex and few have the experience to do it correctly the first time.

Anyone that might be interested in seeing the Shelby install to determine if it might be something for their application, feel free to contact me about setting up a time to visit the shop.

All the best
 
This is actually him being brief :eek
Is there really a new unit/version coming out? I'm looking into Motec for my car.
Hi Will,

Yes... the New Magnesium Series is almost ready.

Three years ago at PRI, as a dealer we were shown the new boxes. There were no boards just the Magnesium cases and connectors... they had lead weights in them to show us the actual finished weight :)

Two years ago at PRI we got to see the boards... beautiful stuff. The have latest and greatest processors. The M800 is the best aftermarket ECU on the market in my opinion, especially, considering the capabilities of the software. However, one of the limitations of the M800, if you can call it that, is that the processor and memory allocations are tapped out. To add functionality they have to remove something else.

In complex control systems where the dealer has a lot of functionality set up, you can max out the processor. Especially, when you have a lot going on already and then add GPS to the ECU for something like 5th wheel speed sensing for traction control on an all wheel drive vehicle. It's not a big deal, I'm talking fully loaded M800s (rare), you just have to watch the ECU usage if you're doing a lot of stuff in the software to make sure you’re not overloading the processor with a lot of complex calculations. Point is, they put a get down processor and tons of memory into the new ECUs to move the technology along as the software and capabilities continue to increase.

Last year we got to see the software... it’s a quantum leap in capabilities and will nullify the continuing debate about MoTeC or Bosch or Pi/Pactel (now Cosworth) as being the best pro box.... it’s not even a question now... nothing else is even close.

This year at PRI, it’s not confirmed but it has been hinted at and we suspect the boxes will drop for pro series usage. MoTeC is currently field testing many of the new units. I won't know anything for sure until PRI. MoTeC’s top chosen dealers will have the ability to request beta units, I have a few projects that I'm looking at requesting beta units for ahead of the public drop.

If you're looking for a new Mag series ECU, serious, and would like more information we should set up a time to speak more in depth about your project and the subject of using the new ECUs.

Cheers
I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about motec traction control setups.
Hi Brian,

TC is fairly straight forward on control strategies… there are just a lot of settings for each strategy that offer a ton of different configurations.

The first step is that TC is a safety net and not a crutch… power management is equally important as good TC when it comes to managing stability for the purpose of safety and maximizing acceleration. Boost by gear is my first choice in power management on high horsepower blown cars… multiple nitrous stage cars I prefer to setup stage by gear.

You can do TC 4 basic ways in the M800.

1. DBW- uses the throttle to limit power. I don’t prefer this method as DBW throttle blades are quick but not as quick as ignition cut that can be implemented within one cycle. Ignition cut reacts much much quicker on high horsepower cars.

2. Ignition Cut Only- my preferred method as it reacts and can be implemented the quickest. It has the ability to be set up as a randomized cut to prevent a cylinder from “loading up”. It also has a wide range of effectiveness… 0-100% ignition cut = 0-100% power

3. Ignition Retard then Ignition Cut- it starts with retard and then phases in cut. The problem with this method is that powerful cars laugh at ignition retard. The pro viper I support for Dave Fiorelli (PST at Motorsports ranch) is NA and makes somewhere around 800 at the crank. It runs right through ignition retard like it’s not even being applied. It takes so much retard to do anything on a high hp car that you end up putting too much heat into the exhaust valves and the exhaust. This is why I just use cut.

4. Retard only- great for cars where you are already close on your power management and don’t want anyone to know you’re using cut. You can hear cut. It’s great for drag vehicles were they have slicks and good power control already but just want a little help and no one to know about it. I love being sneaky :)

I highly recommend TC for street vehicles with lots of power. The cars are very powerful and easy to lose for no fault of your own (something down in front of you). The loss of car, life, or legal repercussions from either are very real threats. TC is a great safety net that helps buffer this possibility and increase consistent acceleration at the same time. Less feathering from the driver and more consistent, faster pulls.


That’s pretty much it in a nut shell.
 
Last one, I promise.
I don't agree with your rationale behind waste gate spring selection, especially for a street car where drive by wire is not an option.
Hi Andrew,

I'll be the first to agree there's more than one way to do something... that's one of the best things about MoTeC, is every tuner has a different approach or mentality... the software allows you to choose your own method without being confined to someone else’s idea on how it "has to be done".

I've just recently, over the last week, have been drawing out a control strategy that allows me to run a 2-3 psi spring and still make 30+ psi by only adding another boost solenoid to the lower diaphragm of the gate. This will also take up one extra Auxiliary output of the ECU. I haven't had a chance to do this yet but I'm 99% sure I can make it work. If this works it would allow not having to add a DBW motor,but its not proven and testing would have to validate the idea. The PID control of the boost control algorithm would be ineffective but I believe it could work well.

What do you propose? I definitely don't know everything and am always up for learning a better way to do something.

Looking forward to your ideas.
Post up knock info! Also did you check your inbox / email in here?
Hi Guys,

This is for those interested in becoming educated on the subject of knock control. It’s long but could be much much longer due the nature of the subject.

Knock control is very complex … detonation is a very complex subject in and of itself as we all know. The more I learn, the more I realize I don’t know anything. Combustion, detonation, and the variables that effect them are ridiculously complicated. This is my best “short” explanation to the best of my current ability, understanding, and experience.

MoTeC will only sell the SKM (Stand-Alone Knock Module) to dealers that have been trained on knock due to how complicated it is to get correct. In June of 2009, MoTeC invited their top 20 US dealers to attend the first knock training seminar at Kroyer’s Nascar/Engine Development facility in Las Vegas. FM is an authorized MoTeC SKM dealer, installer, and tuner as a result of being invited, attending, and training at that dealer training seminar.

At that meeting we ran a 429 cuin V8 desert race motor that was 13:1 compression….. once the knock was set up, we made multiple full pulls on the dyno, ON PUMP GAS, without hurting the motor. As impressive as that was to us, you had 20 of MoTeC’s top dealers with tons of experience, all standing around blown away with the fact that we couldn’t hear the detonation when it wasn’t consistently knocking . It was randomly detonating, the MoTeC was picking it up and stopping it, but we couldn’t hear any of it. The biggest thing that all of us agreed on was that if you can audibly hear detonation, it’s so far gone and over center it’s not even funny. It takes about a full day to set up the knock control with the MoTeC once you know what you’re doing.

The MoTeC system works and works well… MoTeC will not release products that are ineffective. The issue is, as I’ve stated before, that the computer is only as good as the person on the keyboard. If knock control is set up incorrectly then it will be ineffective. This is why MoTeC polices what dealers are authorized to sell and install the SKMs. Contact Phil Blank EXT 160 or Simon Wagner EXT 161 at MoTeC West 1-(714)-897-6804 for US MoTeC SKM dealers and/or recommend Dallas SKM dealers.

He’s a very brief rundown of knock and the MoTeC control of it.

In the cylinder, under normal combustion, a boundary layer forms near the walls of the combustion chamber, cylinder, and piston top… the boundary layer acts as a thermal insulator just as dual plane glass or a thermos works by using the air in-between as the insulator. This is how a drag turbo gasoline race engine can expel 1900F exhaust gases (originating in the combustion chamber) without melting a hole in the aluminum that becomes molten at approximately 1200F. This boundary layer is the thermal insulator. During detonation, the pressure waves that spike, disrupts this boundary layer and destroys the thermal barrier that prevents the aluminum in the piston and combustion chamber from over temping. Once this boundary layer is disrupted massive amounts of heat pour into the metal components. The boundary layer doesn’t immediately reform on the next cycle. If it was too hot during the previous cycle causing the detonation, the next cycle is even hotter so it knocks again and again and again leading to more and more heat poured in to the metal…. Eventually the heat makes the metal molten and the pressure blows it out.

When a motor detonates and the pressure waves collide… it causes the metal components exposed to the collision to ring. This is the pinging sound people refer to. This ring resonates through the motor at many different frequencies. The key is that the motor, under normal combustion resonates at a much narrower frequency range. Select the frequency range that the motor rings at under knock but not where it rings under normal operation and you can effectively sense and control knock.

So if the knock strategy is properly developed, the tuner will monitor the engine with the MoTeC ECU and SKM, properly interpret the data, setup the frequencies to target, and then program the computer to handle the knock properly. You then have a system that works very well and protects the investment in your motor.

The problem with counting on a “properly tuned motor” is that there are other variables outside your control…. One of the largest being fuel. Did the guy pumping gas into the filling station underground storage tank mess up and put 91 into a half full 93 tank? 87 into it? Bad gas is a very common problem.
For example... the reason we chose the SKM on the Shelby is:

#1 Bad gas in Houston which my customer has had previous problems with multiple times.

#2 The car will see race gas and about 36 psi boost… making big power at high boost levels you’re more prone to experiencing detonation

#3 Anything can happen, multiple electric fuel pumps and one fails leading to a lean condition, electric intercooler pump failure leading to high inlet temps, thermostat fails leading to higher engine temps all of this makes it more prone to causing detonation, etc, etc, etc…. it’s just cheap insurance

# 4 Customer doesn’t want the proper “soft” tune up that we absolutely know doesn’t detonate. He wants the aggressive tune up that lives on the edge of detonation running as much boost and timing as possible on pump and race gas without worrying about hurting the motor from detonation. When a motor lives on the edge of detonation it will on occasion have a random cylinder that will knock every now and then. If you don’t have knock control it will keep knocking and hurt the motor. With knock control it will catch it and prevent engine damage. This allows more safe horsepower when leaning on the motor. Is this the primary reason for running Knock Control… no, not everyone wants this benefit; it’s just one that is possible once the Knock Control is implemented.

One knock event won’t hurt a pump gas motor… it’s the multiple successive knock events that build up heat leading to the failure. If it knocks once and you give the motor 10-15 cycles to remove the heat, rebuild its boundary layer, and reestablish normal combustion, then motor will survive and continue to run just fine.



It was asked what happens to properly set up knock:

The car once tuned will be subjected to a light amount of knock. Knock at 40 psi is way different from knock at 0 boost. I personally get the motor warm 200-220ish and then for a nanosecond make the motor detonate at very light load (no boost). Light detonation is not sensible by the human ear. To hear light knock you have to have specialized equipment that samples the knock sensor and amplifies the signal, then send that into a headset and then it is audibly detectable. I do this while recording the knock signal into the laptop. This gives me the “knock signature” of that motor. This is the frequency of ring that only shows up under knock.

Light detonation at this level due to the very limited time it is subjected, does not damage the motor.

Every different motor has different knock signatures, every engine combination that is different has different knock signatures… the same motor with a different header and exhaust, in the same car, has different knock signatures…. Anything different on the motor changes the frequencies that the motor rings at. This is why the proper analysis and software set up is critical.

Once set up and operating here’s the process.

The ECU outputs a “knock window” to the SKM. This window is based on crank degrees and tells the SKM when it can “look for knock”. Typical knock windows will start at or just after TDC and end about 40-50 degrees after TDC. This is where most motors will knock and where the SKM is allowed to report knock to help filter out any possible event that isn’t truly knock. False signals can be exterior background noises… an example is rocks from a gravel road slung onto and bouncing off the bottom of the oil pan on a rally car. The knock window is just a filter to help prevent ignition retard from false signals.

Once a value of knock falls within the knock window , since it falls within the knock window and the ECU is driving the window, it knows which cylinder it was that knocked. If that cylinder’s knock is above the allowable threshold set in the software for that cylinder… the computer retards timing in that cylinder based on how much and how long it was set up to retard for. I pull out timing based on how little or much it knocks and then phase the retard out over time. I can set up long term trims and control how they come in and out too. It’s very sophisticated and has a ton of different settings to do as little or as much as the dealer wants. It’s like Traction Control, you don’t want to live on it… the data allows me to fine tune the engine…. If I have a single cylinder knocking I can trim it in the tune and keep it from always being the lame duck. It is a tool that allows me to finely map the ignition map and then let the knock be a safety net and not a crutch.
Here are a few images showing the amplified audio recording from the knock sensor and images of the data from the ECU showing the knock being implemented and working.

This image is the audio recording from the sensor. I use this to determine the freq range for normal operation and for knock... you can see the difference between the two freq.
AudioSample.jpg


This image is of the data trace showing the knock levels occurring on the different cylinders... notice each cyl is a different color. The high spikes are the detonation events. Notice it spikes and then goes away... that's a catch and stoppage of detonation.
Datasample1.jpg


This one is another but shows the ign retard short trim and the long trims starting to come in. It also shows the knock threshold which is where the MoTeC will start doing ign retard. You can see the background noise from normal operation and then the actual detonation spikes and corresponding retards.
DataSample2.jpg



This link to a video made by Pete Swinny from MoTeC Australia R&D center. MoTeC produces plug and play kits for many watercraft. This one has the motor turbo charged making 300+ with MoTeC ECU, Dash, Shift Light Module, Launch Control (prevent jet cavitations), GPS, Video Capture System, and Knock Control... notice the SLM, The SLM is controlled by the Dash and does a ton more than just RPM and Shift Lights... the first four lights are set to blink red when cyl 1-4 have a knock event. Cyl #1 is led one, cyl #2 is led two, etc... You can see it blink every now and then :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_scyqIsyQc


Some have said that proper knock control is “Too expensive” . Expensive is a relative term. We all know that the people charging to do the work, their overhead, and their labor rates, # of people needed to complete the task, instrumentation used, etc, etc, etc… all dictate the overall cost of something.

For around 3 grand for the device, a day’s labor to wire and install it, one day’s work on the dyno to set it up correctly, I personally think it’s is a good investment to protect a 10K, 20K, 30K, street engine and even 100K+ race engines. It’s a good tool that can help protect the engine, vehicle, and driver… a motor that grenades can lead to fires and/or oil under the tires leading to a possible vehicle loss.

The tool works best on street engine clearances... the bigger piston clearances and solid cams in some drag motors make substantially more background noise and limit the tools ability to differentiate engine noise from detonation ring.

I know it was long but hope this answers most of the basic questions any of you might have on knock control and its ability to be effectively and reasonably implemented.

All the best :drinking:
 
Thanks Mark, good, accurate information!

I have two questions in regards to a Motec on a FGT.

1. Are a piggy back, or OEM ECU connectors available?
2. Did Shawn reverse engineer the CAN bus so that the Motec can run the stock gauges?
 
I will need to get in touch with this guy. My Ferrari Testarossa now has the Motec M48 in it now and I will be doing a complete engine mod next year looking to get at least 525hp out of the old gal. I want to go with sequential injection, ITB's, and direct ignition. Not sure if the new Motec can handle this without 2 of them?

John
 
I'll ask him to reply in here. I saw a Testarossa on the road a few days ago... I had forgotten how much I liked them. I know "Fish" (my tuner Shawn Fischer) cut is teeth working with Bob Norwood on Ferraris. They did some twin turbo Testarossas making 1000+ hp back in the late 90s. That's when a 1000hp was freaking unbelievable. Don't get me wrong, its impressive now but in 1998 nobody had a streetable 1000hp car, much less a streetable 1000hp Ferrari Testarossa.
 
I had Norwoods Performance (James Patterson) do the original Motec.

John
 
Mate

I am sold.. I already have a Motec ECU (M600) in my Porsche 911.... I didn't realize they had developed a knock sensor (which is so important as we are pushing the limits on the stock components on the cars).... Are there any UK dealers that were trained for knock? How do I find out?
 
He tried to reply but there is something wrong with his account. I will send a PM to Dave.
 
Thanks Mark, good, accurate information!

I have two questions in regards to a Motec on a FGT.

1. Are a piggy back, or OEM ECU connectors available?
2. Did Shawn reverse engineer the CAN bus so that the Motec can run the stock gauges?

Hi BlackICE,

I have plans for a piggy back harness that plugs into the factory connectors creating a "jumper harness" but don't have it completed as of yet. A while back Rich was nice enough to send me an ECU and Injector Control box to laser scan the connectors for reproducing my own mates. I have the connectors in CAD currently for both a GT and a GT500. Not sure when I'll have this done... it's a time thing. I do have images of the connectors in CAD... I'll dig those out

Currently a piggy back over the factory harness is the quickest solution. This is how the MoTeC TT GT500 was done. Any sensor that can be shared is shared.... any sensor that can't be shared, like a temp sensor, is added for the MoTeC. The factory computer keeps all of its sensors to keep it happy. It thinks it's in control of the motor.

No CAN bus analysis has been performed as of yet... with the piggy back the factory computer runs the gauges, AC, ETC.... so it's not necessary unless you want to completely remove the factory ECU.
I can do CAN bus reverse engineering though if you're interested in completely removing the factory ECU.

Cheers
 
I'll ask him to reply in here. I saw a Testarossa on the road a few days ago... I had forgotten how much I liked them. I know "Fish" (my tuner Shawn Fischer) cut is teeth working with Bob Norwood on Ferraris. They did some twin turbo Testarossas making 1000+ hp back in the late 90s. That's when a 1000hp was freaking unbelievable. Don't get me wrong, its impressive now but in 1998 nobody had a streetable 1000hp car, much less a streetable 1000hp Ferrari Testarossa.

Man… I really like the look of those TRs… last one we had on the dyno put down 860 on pump just a little over 1000 on race :) It was black on black…looked really tough.
 
I will need to get in touch with this guy. My Ferrari Testarossa now has the Motec M48 in it now and I will be doing a complete engine mod next year looking to get at least 525hp out of the old gal. I want to go with sequential injection, ITB's, and direct ignition. Not sure if the new Motec can handle this without 2 of them?

John

Hi John,

The M48 is the older version software and is considered the entry level ECU for MoTeC. It is intended for a v8. On a v12 it's in batch fire and wasted spark. Not sure on your budget but I would recommend an m800 or waiting till the new ECUs drop publically.

I would recommend not running ITBs as you then have to tune the motor off of Throttle position, which I’m not a big fan of as TP has no tie to actually engine load. The only benefit is SLIGHTLY increasing your throttle response and the detriments on tuning are far greater. If you're wanting turbos it’s a real can of worms with ITB but NA is much more doable if you’re just interested in the bling :)

Just let me know how I can help,

All the best
 
Mate

I am sold.. I already have a Motec ECU (M600) in my Porsche 911.... I didn't realize they had developed a knock sensor (which is so important as we are pushing the limits on the stock components on the cars).... Are there any UK dealers that were trained for knock? How do I find out?

Hi,

Not sure about over there.... there aren't even many guys over here that do knock. I would contact MoTeC Australia and/or MoTeC Europe. Make it a specific point that you need a top level dealer with experience with the knock control. It is complicated and not for the average dealer.

All the best