Driving VS. Flying


S592R

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Dec 3, 2006
2,800
I got back from a trip to Chicago the other day and someone asked me why I drove instead of flying up. Which got me thinking. How many of us drive certain trips instead of flying ... and why?

For me its.

Three hours of layovers waiting for connecting flights to go ANYWHERE.

Getting to the airport two hours early just to stand in a "cattle-cue"

Fighting to get to my luggage on the round-n-round just to find my luggage damaged.

Then the hour drive to the hotel either via taxi or rental car.

Oh yeah and then the cost of the tickets just jumped 15% again.

So if I flew my trip to Chicago would have cost me: 6 hours of waiting and a two and a half our flight plus 1200.00 plus rental car. basically 9.5 hours and the stress of dealing with the airlines.

Where as my driving cost me 8 hours and 163.00 in gas. The depreciation is a write off. I know that somebody is going to say "so is the airfare" but if you look at your tax code changes coming up .... don't be so certain of that anymore. The drive offers solitude, a chance to think about where my life is headed and the ability to stop and see a few things if I choose. The only stress .. dodging Illinois State Troopers ... why can't that state have a more civil speed limit? But I digress.

Obviously, if I was headed to the coast I would fly but where is the break over for most of us? maybe its because I am out in hicksville but still it just made me think.

Oh and I forgot that its soooo lovely to deal with the airlines these days.

I need a jet. thats about it.

S
 
Last edited:
you are right airports are a big hassle anymore And your bags always are worst for the ware. If the drive is less than 10-12 hours I drive
 
You need one of these!

It's a bit of a fuel pig but come next week it's the only way to travel.
King Air full outside with numbers removed.JPG
 
I travel most every week and I have pondered this question many times. For travel in the Northeast, if the distance is 350 miles or less, I now drive. The time is either equal to or less than that of flying. There are a number of obvious advantages associated with driving vs. flying. Even the simple things like having your gym bag at hand, stopping at a Starbucks, etc. are bonuses. In 2006, I flew 150,000 miles (~150 segments); this year, less than 1/3 of that.
 
Put wings on your GT
 
It's a bit of a fuel pig but come next week it's the only way to travel.
View attachment 4423

Jet A is only running $5/gallon most places these days...try not to think of that the next time ATC wants you to hold for 30 minutes...
 
I try to drive as much as I can, just because I enjoy the trip. I don't enjoy cramming into a plane or dealing with an airport. I've driven and flown the entire length of the country in the last year.
 
I would rather drive than fly, unless I can do the flying. It's a control thing. I haven't been rated since USAF out processing in 1973, so I guess I will drive as much as I can. And I agree with Viper Joe, 350 miles is about the break point.
 
We have come to the same conclusion...if it is less than a 12 hr drive, we drive it in one day...
I enjoy driving and the more I drive the shorter the trips seem to become.

Last year I put 30,000 miles on the Expedition, 1000 miles on the TBird and 5000 miles on the Harley Ultra Classic...
Leaving for Pittsburgh Monday and that 300 mile trip now seems like a Sunday drive..
andy
 
I also drive if its 12 hours or less. Next week the Edsel gets a trip from L.A. to Logan, UT!!! Ohhh to drive a failure.....:rolleyes
 
Well, I wish I had a choice...but such is paradise and being on the most isolated land mass on the planet.

Speaking of transportation modes, the Hawaii legislature in a recent special session overturned the court's decision which idled the interisland Superferry. The Superferry is now scheduled to resume service on December 1. Let's hope there's enough support to keep it in business, at least until we bring over you all for the Hawaiian FGT Rally!