Which do you think would be faster/cheaper/more effective (serious question ...'not being a wise guy): (1.) an individual's (or even a class action)lawsuit - which would first require an actual loss (bolt failure & subsequent financial loss), (2.) a complaint to the highway safety feds 2C about a recall action because this involves a drivetrain issue, or, (3.) just sitting on yur duff & waiting for Ford to move on the issue?
It seems that EITHER 1 or 2 would require that the "actuarial tables" be on one's side, because an iceburg moves at a higher rate of speed than either the courts OR the feds. And #3 probably won't happen w/o 1 or 2 happening FIRST... or, God forbid, somebody getting killed or injured.
SHORT TERM, it would seem just individually steping up & fixing the 'bolts on our own is the best - AND ONLY! - IMMEDIATE fix (... which is my own plan whenever the GT Guys send me their kit). But, it also seems that the PRINCIPLE of the thing demands that Ford (or Riccaro[sp?]) proactively address the pblm and shoulder the cost of fixing what's OBVIOUSLY a design flaw. Especially when it's a 10 cent fix relative to the price paid to BUY the car in the 1st place.
'Just my $.02
E.P.