I am too old to get any of this, but I'm sure it's funny.
Didn't Ford build the GT40 in under a year from concept to race ready?
All this makes no sense to me. Our Ford GT was announced several years before actual production. There was a lot of hype, magazine articles on the prototypes, testing, repeated announcements and news releases etc..we all knew it was coming well in advance and were slobbering all over ourselves to get one. It was intentionally planned that way.
The Ford GT took a herculean effort with a myriad of suppliers to be able to be ready for delivery is a very short time.
We are now less then 3 weeks from a new Ford GT announcement with the car being ready for LeMans in June????? There has been not one shred of evidence of any new car, no specifics nothing, no spy shots, no leaks nothing. Doesn't make sense to me but hey, I don't profess to be an expert on the auto industry.
Is this new car going to run in the "prototype" class? Would have to since none have been produced to qualify for GT classes.
How has Ford kept such a secret in their involvement in the design and building of such a car ready to compete on the world stage for the first time at LeMans without any testing that anyone knows of before hand? While debuting a new at LeMans is a great opportunity it is also a great opportunity to get embarrassed if your ducks are not in a row. Seems like this new GT would have been tested and would be still in testing somewhere that would be seen and known about somewhere. I would think anyway.
Also, if this is a racing prototype it is likely years away from civilian production and DOT certification I would think.
This is not adding up to me.
Just saying.
Regardless of the timeline, if Ford plans on producing homologated street versions of a LeMans racecar, it would have to be the most well kept automotive secret of all time. Not a peep from anyone from Ford, no test mules roaming about, not one spy pic from any of the automotive paparazzi. Suppose it's possible for a skunkworks to keep a GT-class or LMP racecar under wraps since the team involved would be relatively small and contained. But I personally don't see how there could be any production car prototype ready for NAIAS without some shred of tangible evidence.
Didn't Ford build the GT40 in under a year from concept to race ready?
For the 2015 Nissan effort I personally know of people that have been working on the nuts and bolts for a year now and some of the drivers that have been hired giving the effort 18 months minimum. As for a new Ford GT and rumored CGR involvement, they have been developing the V-6 Ecoboost for over a year and it has preformed well. That just leaves the chassis and if the target is 3 weeks to showcase and June 2016 to race, I would think that would be enough time.
Seriously, announce in January, and with no track time on the car and no time for the racing team to become familiar with the car we'll just go to LeMans? The only ones I've ever known to be successful at putting on a successful show in Dad's barn were Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney.They will need a full season in other venues to even get invited to Le Mans. This means that for all intents and purposes, the car has to exist in some form.
We'll see what the FIA press conference is all about.
Then all of the easy paths that could have generated a full production vehicle in three months have been exhausted.
OK, OK, I know how they're going to do it:
Hey Rocky, Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat
![]()
Then all of the easy paths that could have generated a full production vehicle in three months have been exhausted.
Just in case I missed it, what makes you think they would have to generate a production vehicle in three months?