Great article. Buy one while you can still get this level of performance ~ 'your kids won't have that opportunity'.....
I definitely don't think that's the case. Or at least not until I see concrete evidence otherwise. I have a Flex that runs the same 1/4 mile my first V8 Mustang did while getting 23 mpg. Ferrari is coming out with a 740 hp GT car, and an Enzo successor that by all accounts may be 900 hp. Viper is 640 hp and under 3300 lbs. Lamborghini sells a 700 hp car that will run 10.5@136 mph. A 100% stock 2013 Nissan GT-R just went 10.87@125 with a 2.7 0-60 time. All these cars do this stuff while being safer and more fuel efficient than ever before. Sophisticated AWD systems, direct injection, turbochargers and a host of other technological advancements like incredibly sticky tires that actually last under regular road use are making cars faster and safer at an astounding rate.
People were sounding the death knell when the 03 Cobra came out. It was too fast and too much hp for too cheap. 10 years later, a stock Mustang makes more torque at 1000 rpm than the 03 Cobra did anywhere, and it gets better fuel economy. Who knows where performance is headed? I'll tell you this: SVT isn't going backwards. And that I know of, nobody else is either. Next Corvette is going to be another major leap in performance.
So, I was just wondering............
Has the convertible top been tested to 200 mph?
Wow, that's great!!!
How do you think it will stack up to the GT? The Mustang has more horsepower but the GT has aerodynamics. The 'Stang is still kind of a brick into the wind. The hood on my '08 Shelby GT/SC started to flutter at about 145.
On a road course, GT500 is definitely faster.
Thought I read, vert is limited to 160....
Vert is limited to 155.