- May 11, 2006
- 63
Located a new GT that I'd want to buy, but I've never owned a "supercar". Only had a Vette once & now an SLK. I pilot Boeing 777's & not at all concerned about my driving ability. BUT . . . This forum's lists of problems with the GT, especially the debilitating ones like the halfshaft bolts breaking, has just about killed my desire. I want a car that I can drive weekly & reliably. Infact, the GT I was going to purchase would require a 650 mile drive home. Seems like everyone's saying that part of the "supercar expereience" is maintenance issues (whether a Lambo, Ferrari, GT, etc). I would have no qualms about buying a new Vette or Mercedes and driving it 1,000 miles home carefree. Doesn't seem like one can expect that from a $170,000+ / 550HP+ car of any make? Roadside assistance & 3yr warranty from Ford is protection, but what about after that? The stuff you guys are having fixed now under warranty would cost a fortune after year three! I have little confidence that I could even drive the first 600 miles (just to get home) without having a roadside issue & tow. Is this "par for the course" for the "supercar experience"? Are there just as many good stories as bad? From used car ads it looks as though most owners drive their "supercars" less than 1,000 miles per year. I'd likely drive a GT about 8,000 per year. Is this unrealistic? Should I stay with something more "conventional" (like a Mercedes SL . . . albeit quite a different animal from the GT) to avoid the "supercar headaches"? This forum has been quite informative & benefical to me. THANKS TO ALL! Comments on this thread would be much appreciated!