The GT has no brake disc wear indicator, but I know now when I have to change them...


Jason Watt

Had both, sold both
Mark II Lifetime
Oct 14, 2005
1,229
Copenhagen, Denmark
brakedisc'.jpg
 
Jason and all...
each rotor also has a Min thickness notation in same font as 'min weight' and clearly readable....
--Min thickness front = 1.39 inch
--Min thickness rear = 1.24 inch.

andy (ajb)
 
Or you could weigh them! Using calipers might be easier than pulling them off the car though!

Ed
 
calipers and measuring would be easier... and could be monitored on a continuing basis. The dimensions are also noted on the rotors in "mm" in addition to 'inch".
andy (ajb)
 
So what is the picture showing us?

Is that rotor worn?
 
Everyone gets out their scales and calipers, and calculates replacement cost per gram and micron of wear. :lol

The picture shows the minimum disc weight.
 
The picture shows the minimum disc weight.

Bingo :-)
 
Everyone gets out their scales and calipers, and calculates replacement cost per gram and micron of wear. :lol

The picture shows the minimum disc weight.

Glad I saved my coke scale from the 1980s.
 
I was just trying to help/ clarify. ..
Your don't have to disassemble and weigh the rotors to note wear status.
Andy (andy)
 
The pads have a electronic wear indicator. There's a sacrificial contact mounted to the base of the brake pad.
when it wears out it opens up the normally closed circuit and then a light should come on.. also the pad material is riveted on to the base plates with brass rivets. If you get a brassy appearance on the rotors you know the pads are starting to get thin But they're not done at that time. The brass rivets are meant to wear and not damage the rotors.

Conventional brake pads use steel rivets and as some of you have probably seen on pads that wear to thin the rivets grind into the steel rotors which usually leads to resurfacing of the steel rotor. The brass rivets prevent any catastrophic damage to one of these expensive CC rotors..


Weighing rotors is just one component of monitoring the brake componets. . you have to monitor the rotors weight and the thickness. And in reality the rotor can maintain its thickness but lose weight by cooking out the binding material
The rotor would need to be replaced if you got down to that minimum weight as listed . I did an extensive study on the system that I have on my 06 car.

I weighed the rotors new and they allow approximately 30 grams of weight loss before it needs to be replaced

Living with the carbon brakes on my 06. For about 8 years. . I'm on my third set of front pads on the 06. No rotor thickness loss or no weight loss..

The rotors on the new GT are updated material. I don't think anyone will ever wear them out unless they're tracking the car every weekend...
 
Last edited:
Brian.. with all that knowledge, you should call Ford and volunteer to be a "Ford GT Concierge Specialist".
Seriously. ..
Andy (ajb)
 
Brian.. with all that knowledge, you should call Ford and volunteer to be a "Ford GT Concierge Specialist".
Seriously. ..
Andy (ajb)

That's why we have this place we can cut out the middleman...:biggrin
 
The pads have a electronic wear indicator. There's a sacrificial contact mounted to the base of the brake pad.
when it wears out it opens up the normally closed circuit and then a light should come on.. also the pad material is riveted on to the base plates with brass rivets. If you get a brassy appearance on the rotors you know the pads are starting to get thin But they're not done at that time. The brass rivets are meant to wear and not damage the rotors.

Conventional brake pads use steel rivets and as some of you have probably seen on pads that wear to thin the rivets grind into the steel rotors which usually leads to resurfacing of the steel rotor. The brass rivets prevent any catastrophic damage to one of these expensive CC rotors..


Weighing rotors is just one component of monitoring the brake componets. . you have to monitor the rotors weight and the thickness. And in reality the rotor can maintain its thickness but lose weight by cooking out the binding material
The rotor would need to be replaced if you got down to that minimum weight as listed . I did an extensive study on the system that I have on my 06 car.

I weighed the rotors new and they allow approximately 30 grams of weight loss before it needs to be replaced

Living with the carbon brakes on my 06. For about 8 years. . I'm on my third set of front pads on the 06. No rotor thickness loss or no weight loss..

The rotors on the new GT are updated material. I don't think anyone will ever wear them out unless they're tracking the car every weekend...

great Information Brian !
 
Seriously. I found that fascinating! Thanks Stormcat!
 
You should start up a blog: GTalopnik, I’ll subscribe!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Here's a few pictures of a worn Brembo pad. I have a new set of pads for the new GT and the perimeter size and layout are exactly the same.

I'm not sure if the actual pad composite material is the same . I think Brembo is always improving the binders and additives for the pad material.

You can see the brass retaining studs or rivets And you can see the electronic wear sensor. . Unfortunately I don't have the built-in system to monitor the pads on the 06 GT so I have to do it visually.

These pads actually have a little life left in them before they get to the face of the wear sensor. Ironically before I knew how the pads were put together I started to notice a reddish orange tint to the face of the rotor . Once I inspected the pads I realized it was the brass material starting to collect on the face of the rotor..
 

Attachments

  • 2018-05-25 15.17.10.jpg
    2018-05-25 15.17.10.jpg
    131.8 KB · Views: 107
  • 2018-05-25 15.17.32.jpg
    2018-05-25 15.17.32.jpg
    89.3 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
Do you get brake dust with these fancy carbon binders?
 
Do you get brake dust with these fancy carbon binders?

Yes, you get some brake dust. On a hard track day you get more
 
I love brake dust.
 
You pads look like eccentrics clutch