Part 2 - Le Mans – The rest of the story.


ChipBeck

GT Owner
Staff member
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 13, 2006
5,788
Scottsdale, Arizona
Gentlemen,

Day two, Tuesday, we had many more Forum members in attendance. Again, no cars would be on the track until tomorrow so I spent this day learning about the track, the cars, the drivers, and the current rules governing the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

First, the track. It is so big, about 8 1/2 miles, it’s hard to form a good mental picture. It has changed over a dozen times since the inaugural race in the 1920s. It use to be over 10 miles long and had far fewer turns. Since the 1966 1-2-3 Ford GT victory there have been five major modifications to the racetrack at Le Mans. The 3 ½ mile long Mulsanne straight has had two chicanes added at about 1 mile intervals to slow the cars down. The Porsche curve was added about one half mile before the grand stand straight, and the Ford curve was added to slow traffic just before that grandstand straight. The Dunlap chicane was added just before the giant Dunlap Tire bridge. I decided the only way to get a real feel for this track was to walk its entire length. DBK, Andy & Margaret, and Ralphie (who took a short cut) agreed to accompany me. Andy Benedict did an excellent write up on the track itself so I will not repeat it here. About 3/4 of the entire race track consists of public roads that would not be closed until shortly before the first practice session tomorrow. The racetrack surface on both the public road and private parts of the course was uniformly excellent. Moving as rapidly as we could it still took well over two hours to cover the 8 ½ miles. The small hotels and ancient buildings pictured along the side of the race track in Steve McQueen’s 1970 movie Le Mans are exactly the same today as they were back then. The entire race track is marginally lit at night. It is not brightly lit, but there is enough light such that you could drive it with your headlights off. The vast majority of this race track passes through a forest of trees and very few areas contained a grandstand. Walking the 8 ½ mile track was physically tiring but very worthwhile.

The cars. How similar are they to the Ford GTs that we drive? Current GT-1 rules require that these cars use regular production car frames and chassis (passenger compartments). The chassis complete with front and rear sub-frames, and bumpers are regular production Ford GT pieces. That is where the similarity ends however. The doors, fenders, clamshell, hood, front and rear splitters, and belly pans are all very lightweight carbon fiber reproductions. Windshield and side windows are shatterproof polycarbonate. The polycarbonate side windows are fixed in place and do not roll down, just like the 1960s originals. There is no back window between the passenger and engine compartments and in its place is a solid firewall. A rear facing camera mounted to the top of the rear bumper with a screen on the dash provides rearward visibility along with the side mirrors. Although Martin has purchased five new Ford GT’s, the current GT-1 cars were built from brand-new replacement tubs complete with front and rear subframes that were purchased from Ford. Matech has stamped their own serial numbers into the frames. The new black Ford GT parked outside of our hospitality area is the car that was used to verify specifications to the FIA on the GT-1 cars for homologation purposes. Because of the unexpectedly high accident rate of the new Ford GT, Ford found it necessary to put the chassis (tub) and subframes back into production to build 100 additional units so that wrecked Ford GT road cars could be rebuilt. In addition to those 100, 14 complete chassis with front & rear subframes were manufactured for Matech and shipped to their shop in Germany. Two of those were turned in to the current GT-1 racecars and the rest will be used if a car is damaged beyond repair or a replacement car needs to be built.

GT-1 rules allow these cars to be 100mm (about 4 inches) wider than stock. You can see this in the photographs taken from above the pit area and looking straight down at the cars. The front and rear fenders bulge out two additional inches on each side. Front and rear suspension A arms are custom-built pieces and rules require their attach points be within 15 mm of a stock GT. Four way adjustable gas/nitrogen KW coil-overs are used at all four corners. LeMans rules require that all closed cockpit cars be equipped with air conditioning that keeps the cabin temperature at a maximum of 32° C. If the cabin temperature exceeds 32° C the car is required to pit until the AC can be fixed. This is to keep the fire suited drivers from overheating during multi-hour stints behind the wheel. In the cockpit photos you can see a big 4 vent A/C unit pointed toward the driver from the floor board where the passenger seat would normally be. The A/C compressor is driven via a belt from a pulley mounted on the right rear half shaft.

Wheels are BBS center bolt, 18 inch diameter, 13 inch wide, front and rear. Five different tire manufacturers raced at Le Mans this year, the Matech team used Michelin. They had on hand both soft and medium compound slicks as well as two different types of rain tires.

Antilock brakes are not allowed in GT-1 although they are allowed in GT-3 competition. The Matech cars used AP Racing six pot mono block calipers with massive carbon fiber discs and carbon fiber pads. Photos display the massive cooling hoses leading from the front brake ducts and rear side scoops of the GT to cool those brakes as well as different color temperature sensitive paint on the edges of the rotors.

The Matech cars do not use the 5.4 L dry sump Ford GT engine. GT-1 rules require that the car be homologated using an engine from the manufacturer (Ford) of the vehicle. The engine used by Matech is the normally aspirated Ford 5.0L “Cammer” 32 valve V-8, built by Roush. The motors are bored and stroked to 5.3L and when breathing through a pair of 31.6 mm restrictors (required by GT-1 rules to balance power between competitors) the motor puts out 560 rearwheel horsepower. Unrestricted the motor puts out about 100 more HP, 665 HP. All GT-1 cars are rear wheel drive only. Those two restrictors can be seen in the photos between the air cleaners and the twin air boxes on top of the engine. These motors are designed to last only “30 hours” and must be returned to Roush in the United States for rebuilding. The motors are delivered to Matech partially disassembled, most likely to ease their way through the scrutinering process where race officials verify that each car complies with existing rules.

At LeMans, each car is allowed two engines. The two engines that will be used must be declared to race officials. Once a car leaves the paddock with an engine, either during qualifying or during the race, the engine in the car must be one of the two declared engines. If it blows up one minute into the first practice, the team has used up one of their two available engines. Thereafter, the second engine would have to be used for all qualifying as well as the entire race itself. Virtually every car at LeMans starts the actual race with a brand-new fresh engine. The teams use a new or low time engine to practice and qualify, and then replace it with a brand-new engine to make it through the actual 24 hour race. If an engine has not left the paddock, it could be swapped for another as long as race officials are informed.

The transmission in the Matech cars is a six speed, sequential, straight cut gear, cassette type transmission. All the guts can be removed, inspected, and replaced within a few minutes. I asked Martin why the team did not use paddle shifters on the steering wheel. He informed me that GT-1 rules stipulate that since the original Ford GT had it’s shifter on the center console, the race car must have its shifter on the center console as well. The race car shifter moves only forward and back because of that sequential transmission.

The roll cage that snakes through and around the entire car is not welded to the frame or the body anywhere. Again, rules prohibit this. The roll cage can only be bolted to the existing structure of the cars. I don’t know the reason for this and forgot to ask. The car’s fuel cell is located in the stock position but is filled through two openings (one filler and one vent) on the top of the hood just in front of the windshield. The car carries enough fuel for just over an hour at race speeds. The tires are normally changed every two hours (depending upon temperature and track condition). The car has onboard air jacks that lift all 4 wheels off the ground when an airhose is connected to a fitting on the right hand side of the car. Tires are not allowed to be changed while the car is being fueled and unlike NASCAR, only two individuals per side are allowed to change the tires. So the back tires are changed first, then the same four individuals, two per side, run to the front to change those tires. This makes tire change/fuel pit stops fairly lengthy so those are also the stops where the team changes drivers.

The car is equipped with two independent starters, either of which can start the car if the other suffers a complete failure. The cars must be shut off while being fueled, so those dual starters are quite important!

For Le Mans the cars are equipped with a ton of MoTec telemetry that is not used for the other GT-1 Series races. Just about everything on the car (shock absorbers, cooling system, engine, transmission, speed, position, etc.) is relaying information back to the pits.

With their lightweight carbon fiber bodywork and devoid of power windows and locks, stereos, and anything else that smacks of creature comfort (except that air conditioner) Matech Ford GTs are 800 pounds lighter than our Ford GTs!! The race cars weigh about 2600 pounds.

So much information was relayed to me on that Tuesday. I don’t have any more time today to write about the drivers, team history, or other matters so I’ll stop for now.

Stay tuned for Part 3. All the best.

Chip
 

Attachments

  • 22 1.jpg
    22 1.jpg
    371.2 KB · Views: 826
  • 22 2.jpg
    22 2.jpg
    337.5 KB · Views: 823
  • 22 3.jpg
    22 3.jpg
    366.7 KB · Views: 825
  • 22 4.jpg
    22 4.jpg
    341 KB · Views: 818
  • 22 5.jpg
    22 5.jpg
    354.6 KB · Views: 982
Last edited:
2
 

Attachments

  • 22 6.jpg
    22 6.jpg
    304.5 KB · Views: 878
  • 22 7.jpg
    22 7.jpg
    332.4 KB · Views: 857
  • 22 8.jpg
    22 8.jpg
    308.6 KB · Views: 855
  • 22 9.jpg
    22 9.jpg
    342.8 KB · Views: 874
  • 22 10.jpg
    22 10.jpg
    287.9 KB · Views: 1,042
3
 

Attachments

  • 22 11.jpg
    22 11.jpg
    316.4 KB · Views: 825
  • 22 12.jpg
    22 12.jpg
    335.5 KB · Views: 777
  • 22 13.jpg
    22 13.jpg
    347.8 KB · Views: 863
  • 22 14.jpg
    22 14.jpg
    330.8 KB · Views: 785
  • 22 15.jpg
    22 15.jpg
    328 KB · Views: 867
4
 

Attachments

  • 22 16.jpg
    22 16.jpg
    314.6 KB · Views: 775
  • 22 17.jpg
    22 17.jpg
    393.3 KB · Views: 789
  • 22 18.jpg
    22 18.jpg
    285.5 KB · Views: 839
  • 22 19.jpg
    22 19.jpg
    330.3 KB · Views: 782
  • 22 20.jpg
    22 20.jpg
    341.8 KB · Views: 791
5
 

Attachments

  • 22 21.jpg
    22 21.jpg
    244 KB · Views: 840
  • 22 22.jpg
    22 22.jpg
    322.3 KB · Views: 944
Thanks CHIP!!!!!!!!!
 
Chip, a great writeup!

I have two questions.

1. Is the maxiumum temperature allowed in the cabing 58C or 58F? Must be C.

2. Why are there KW bump cans on the Penske shocks?

attachment.php
 
the corner units (coil over) are KW...... not Penske.
AJB
 
Thanks, Andy. I thought the the purple lockring on the shock was a signature color of KW.
 
I went to the rule book and.....

Chip, a great writeup!

I have two questions.

1. Is the maxiumum temperature allowed in the cabing 58C or 58F? Must be C.

2. Why are there KW bump cans on the Penske shocks?

Ice,

I wrote this up from some notes I took down at the race. I have looked back to see where I got that info and all I saw was "4 way adjustable" so I probably thought I was told Penski and I'm just wrong. Sorry about that, I'm working a lot from memory and my old brain is failing more often these days. My photo clearly shows they are KW. As I mentioned in my first post, anyone should feel free to post up and correct anything I get wrong.

As regards temperature, my notes clearly say 58 degrees F but according to the Le Mans Regulations website, it's 32 degrees C which is 89 F. The exact rule is quoted below.

14.6 – Temperature inside the cockpit (Closed cars):
An effective ventilation and/or air conditioning system must:
• Maintain the temperature around the driver when the
car is in motion :
1. at 32°C maximum when the external temperature
(*) is less than or equal to 32°C,
2. at a temperature less than or equal to external
temperature (*) if it is above 32°C;
• Get the temperature back down to the value defined
above (case 1 or 2) in 8 minutes maximum after a car
stop.
• Be described on the homologation form and approved
by the ACO ;
A temperature sensor can be fitted inside the cockpit by the
organiser at level of driver’s helmet to the centreline of the
car. The sensor must be shielded from direct draught (to the
Scrutineers’ assessment).
A driver suit with improved breathability and complying with
FIA 8856-2000 specifications is strongly recommended.
If the temperature around the driver exceeds the value
defined above (case 1 or 2), or if the sensor is disconnected,
the car will be stopped until the problem is solved.
A driver, who shows at the end of a stint important signs of
tiredness, can be examined by the doctor of the organisation.
If it is due to heat stress, the driver will not be allowed to
participate again in the race.
(*) The external temperature will be measured in the shade and
out of the wind. This temperature will be displayed near the pit
lane.

Martin Bartek gave me one of his copies of the Matech Ford GT's GT-1 FIA Homologation Construction Book which is full of photos and tech info on the race car. It does not specify the coilover maker. I'll change what I got wrong in the original post. :ack

Chip
 

Attachments

  • 22 25.jpg
    22 25.jpg
    273.4 KB · Views: 774
Last edited:
Chip,
Your great writing about about these incredible automobiles and your LeMans adventure add to the rich history (in the making), experience and pride of ownership of the Ford GT!
Thank you,
John and Michele.
 
Great !! Thanks Chip !!:pop:pop:pop:pop
 
Outstanding report Chip, I thought the posts during the race would be all that we would see, thanks so much for taking the time to give us so much more.

Pardon me if it has been discussed elsewhere, but are the Marc VDS cars also built by Matech? If not did you see how they differ?
 
Chip, have you thought about publishing a book about the event? I'll buy one if its autographed...
 
attachment.php


This is what I do...but I would make it better and low stress along with a holder to make it faster & easy to mark each part of a car so they can track them better.

Anyhow Chip you missed your calling.
Great reading and most important much of my questions on rules and specs were answered.

Thank you sir Mr. Beck
 
Last edited:
Chip, Great information buddy, buy the next race we'll know all about the GT's and their configuration. Keep the stories coming. Thanks. Tomy
 
Marc VDS

Pardon me if it has been discussed elsewhere, but are the Marc VDS cars also built by Matech? If not did you see how they differ?

ZRChris,

The Marc VDS Ford GT was built by Maytech Competition who will build one for any other privateer that wishes to campaign it. Every innovation and improvement that is developed by Maytech and incorporated into their own cars is shared with the Marc VDS Team. Marc VDS has one victory in their Ford GT and that is a source of great pride for Martin Bartek and his Maytech Team. That a privateer can buy one of their cars, take it to a major event, AND WIN. There is an open line of communication between the two teams and the cars are identical in virtually every way. All the best.

Chip
 
Last edited:
Outstanding report Chip, I thought the posts during the race would be all that we would see, thanks so much for taking the time to give us so much more.

Pardon me if it has been discussed elsewhere, but are the Marc VDS cars also built by Matech? If not did you see how they differ?

I spent a little time with the VDS team and from all they'd say, their car is virtually identical to the Matech cars.

Drivers lining up before old-style LeMans start...
attachment.php




Getting the green flag to roll off
attachment.php




A successful lap completed
attachment.php




Heroically limping home and a sad early retirement
attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Chip, I think you mean carbon-ceramic rotors and pads, not CF. Great write-up. Since I know you guys were eating quiche, what did the women have to say about it all?
 
Great write up as always Chip! Looking forward to Part III! :thumbsup