3.4 vs 4.0 Whipple


A supercharger is tough on a motor... I went with the 3.4 because it is ENOUGH for me and is easier on the motor..

I believe it will preserve the life of engine by having the 3.4 and tuning it conservatively.

I know some guys want more power than that, but I think the most I would do in the future is change the pulley to gain some more HP but don't think I'll do that for a while..

I couldn't agree with u more. I have not lost a street challenge yet and its power enough for me.
 
I couldn't agree with u more. I have not lost a street challenge yet and its power enough for me.

Your just a bad seed Sam, it's just as simple as that. Thus the real reason I left So Cal, the streets are no longer safe with you driving around searching for 600's, and 2002's to beat up on.... one of your conquests Sam? http://microcarmuseum.com/tour/bmw600-yellow.html
 
Your just a bad seed Sam, it's just as simple as that. Thus the real reason I left So Cal, the streets are no longer safe with you driving around searching for 600's, and 2002's to beat up on.... one of your conquests Sam? http://microcarmuseum.com/tour/bmw600-yellow.html

Believe it or not Steve you are a worst pot stirrer than I can ever be. Actually like the 600 and Izettas as well. I saw an absolutely gorgeous 3.0 CSI this weekend with low miles and a CA car. Too bad not for sale.
 
Supercharger's are a terrible option for peek hp numbers, they destroy the motor from the inside-out, and their fuel to power ratios are laughable!

God I love mine. The upside is they are badass.