+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: New Member Dyno With Pulley

  1. #11
    GT Owner piko6 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    125

    Default

    FAST FREDDY!!!

    I wil be honest with you....

    i have done everything stock except for the computer program and the pulley including spark plugs boost gauge and exhaust etc etc

    the reason i know i am pumping that much is becuase whipple said so with th epulley i have they did testing before i put my pulley on mine..

    the gas is indeed only 93 regular octane and that is it..

    i agree with you though that the car can indeed do more safely with more mods,,, the biggest concern at this point is definately rubber...

    i loose traction in second gear without touching the clutch

    thanks


    piko

  2. #12
    GPS'D 225 Fast Freddy is on a distinguished road Fast Freddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    2,189

    Default

    so you are using the stock blower then with a different pulley? whipple has 2 different sized superchargers, a 2.3 L and a 3.3 L. the same pulleys on these different superchargers will make different amounts of boost. so if you are comparing your stock supercharger to the 3.3 L supercharger then you are not making 21 PSi of boost. now if you are comparing your pulley to the pulley that whipple uses on there 2.3 L supercharger than you probably are making 21 psi of boost. did you verify which supercharger whipple is using to get their results with your pulley sizes? i know dustin at whipple is doing work with a ford GT and the 3.3 L supercharger. i run whipples 2.3L supercharger on my muscle boat engine. with a 502 cubic inch chevy V-8 marine engine and a mere 6.5 psi of boost i dyno'd 688 hp and 789 tq on a engine dyno this week. i have include a copy of my dyno sheet here


    Last edited by Fast Freddy; 12-10-2005 at 10:06 AM.
    The Worlds Fastest Open Road Race GT
    Driven 101 miles in 40 minutes Flat
    150 MPH Avg Speed @ The Bonneville 100 Open Road Race
    213 MPH @ Mojave (751 rwhp)
    http://youtube.com/user/FastFreddy488

  3. #13
    GT Owner piko6 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    125

    Default

    FAST FREDDY

    i am just repeating of what dustin said the psi would be,.....

    he said 21 psi on my 2.3 L as the way he tested it...

  4. #14

    Default

    WOW!
    The shape of the torque curve is interesting.

  5. #15
    Crew Chief 50 BMG is on a distinguished road 50 BMG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Hmm...I expected much more than that @ 21 PSI. Mabey I should skip on building up a 5.7+L engine from a Ford GT block and heads

    Basic bolt-ons, stock longblock 04 cobras put that rwhp down at 21 PSI with a tune, coupled with more drivetrain loss than a Ford GT. I know the GT heads for sure and most likely the cams are flowing a ton more air than the 4.6L eaton engine.

    The torque curve is outstanding though...

    Edit: 1 more thing. IMO I would be very careful running 93 octane with that much boost.
    Last edited by 50 BMG; 12-11-2005 at 09:07 AM.

  6. #16
    GT Modifier... one of 101 is on a distinguished road one of 101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    854

    Default

    FYI:

    On the Dallas Mustang web page, they state that their pulley provides 18 psi of boost...

  7. #17
    GT Owner/ B.o.D SLF360 is on a distinguished road SLF360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Italy but lately lot's of Shanghai!
    Posts
    1,243

    Talking pump up the bass

    Quote Originally Posted by one of 101
    FYI:

    On the Dallas Mustang web page, they state that their pulley provides 18 psi of boost...
    I'm going into clinic 23rd december... 21 psi, make no mistake... I want it hard, girls !

  8. #18

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by WhiteBlueGT; 02-09-2006 at 01:32 PM.

  9. #19
    Let's get serious DB4-12K is on a distinguished road DB4-12K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Metro Detroit
    Posts
    8,585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteBlueGT
    they may try and void the warranty but I also heard thay they can't void it unless they can prove it had something to do the the parts that failed.
    This is true, but more boost can pretty much be cited as a component of any type of engine failure. That said, I honestly wouldn't worry about anything going wrong, at 21lbs, most certainly not with the block.

  10. #20
    MODERATOR & FGT OWNER B O N Y is on a distinguished road B O N Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fresno, Ca.
    Posts
    12,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DBK
    This is true, but more boost can pretty much be cited as a component of any type of engine failure. That said, I honestly wouldn't worry about anything going wrong, at 21lbs, most certainly not with the block.
    Here is the dope:
    The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(C))

    This federal law regulates warranties for the protection of consumers. The essence of the law concerning aftermarket auto parts is that a vehicle manufacturer may not condition a written or implied warranty on the consumers using parts or services which are identified by brand, trade, or corporate name (such as the vehicle maker's brand) unless the parts or service are provided free of charge. The law means that the use of an aftermarket part alone is not cause for denying the warranty. However, the law's protection does not extend to aftermarket parts in situations where such parts actually caused the damage being claimed under the warranty. Further, consumers are advised to be aware of any specific terms or conditions stated in the warranty which may result in its being voided. The law states in relevant part:

    “No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name...” (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)).

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts