I would like to know from the Ford GT owners what are the real specs of the Ford GT; 0-60, 0-100, 100-0? Among other things. Because most of us don't know where to look :frown for the real specs on this car.
FordGTGuy said:I would like to know from the Ford GT owners what are the real specs of the Ford GT; 0-60, 0-100, 100-0? Among other things. Because most of us don't know where to look :frown for the real specs on this car.
barondw said:Read the various car magazines. It was either Car & Driver or R & T that had the comparison in their last issue.
Why don't you think these are real numbers?
FordGTGuy said:they varys to much and each magazine has their own locations and ways of testing. Also some magazines like to modify the specs they get :ack
fordification said:Agreed. We're at 3600ft above sea level, and it equates to approximately 1 second slower quarter time.
I personally didn't really care about the performance of the GT. At these power levels, it's mostly about the pilot's expertise. The car looks so much better, has so much more originality and soul than anything else out there, it could have had 500 HP at the flywheel and I'd have been happy.
How many of us will even be able to use the car to the fullest of its abilities? I think I'd need a couple dozen days at the track to even master a car like that, and I neither have the time nor the inclination to subject the GT to something like that.
Ya, there are a few cars that will - ZR1 is one of them...and it will beat the GT too, not in top speed, but in acceleration, easily. ZR1's run 10-second quarters all day long. That being said, I'll take my GT over any other cars in my garage every day of the week, including my 900+ HP Z06. Not only is it fast, but there isn't another car I own or have driven that drives quite like a GT.not with forced induction :thumbsup at 3600 ft there really won't be anything stock that can run with a GT.